no name

[Chucks]

Haven't made anything for a couple of days so I decided I should make something, and I think it looks shet. Thought I should post it up for some dissing.. I got tired of the whole thing so I didn't really bother with the text. Just slapped it on and set it on overlay and saved it

[Smiling Demon]

hmm its alright but im not liking the lighting at all... it just looks kinda rubish... and im not sure if u got it form the right direction looking at the guys face.

[Cambiocorsa]

I actually really like it apart from the text and lighting. The lighting is way too extreme and oddly placed......the signature would be vastly improved with it altered and lessened.

[John]

That's not a bad sig. Not as good as your currents, in my opinion, though. Lighting is a bit intense... I guess it should be intense with the characters left eye being the way it is.

[Einsturzende]

I know that the very thought of leaving the name of the creator off of a signature is taboo enough to make a graphic designer either die laughing or quiver in fear, but I may suggest that you just remove it. The sig itself looks very well done, but that text just kills it.

[Chucks]

I really screwed up with the lighting. I tried fixing it but my skills are too crappy to get it right, lol. I didn't bother saving a .psd for this so I'll just scrap it and try and make a better one. Thanks for the comments guys

[Einsturzende]

I really screwed up with the lighting. I tried fixing it but my skills are too crappy to get it right, lol. I didn't bother saving a .psd for this so I'll just scrap it and try and make a better one. Thanks for the comments guys

The lighting seems fine to me (And I have a really bright screen)... Your composition and blurs are probably the most attractive parts of the sig. But that's just my opinion.

[Chucks]

Thanks

[BmXeR]

looks awsome...... but yer just the light

[TKD]

Nice work, but the render is rubbish